DoPT Clarification on Leave Encashment on LTC

Office of The Controller General of Defence Accounts
Ulan Batar Road, Palam, Delhi Cantt.110010

CIRCULAR
No. AT/IV/4462/PC-XXX
dated: 8th Apr' 2013

To
All PCsDA/CsDA
PC of A (Fys) Kolkata

Sub:- Encashment of leave on availing LTC by family.
Copies of MoD (Fin) ID No. 9 (2)/QA198 dated 20/03/2012 and DOPT I.D No. 14028/2/2013-Estt.(L) dated 25th Feb'2013 regarding clarification on encashment of leave alongwith LTC is enclosed for information, guidance and necessary action please.

sd/-
(Upendra Kumar)
Accounts Officer (AT)

 


Ministry of Defence (Fin/QA)
Subject :Encashment of leave on availing LTC by Family.
Reference CGDA UO No AT/IV/4462/PC-XXX dated 12 Oct 12.

2. A clarification issued by DoPT states that A govt servant can be permitted to encash earned leave upto 10 days either at the time of availing LTC himself or when his family avails it provided other conditions are fulfilled has been taken by MoD (Fin) with MoF, DoPT (Estt/Leave Section). The same has been clarified by DoPT vide their ID No 14028/212013-Estt (L) dated 25th Feb, 2013 is enclosed herewith for your ready reference.

Sd/-
(Lajpat Ra..)
AFA(QA)/ 20.03.2013



Department of Personnel & Training
Estt. (Leave) Section
***
Reference notes of Ministry of Defence (Fin) I.D. No. 9(2)/QA/98 dated 27.12.2012.

In terms of 38-A of CCS (Leave) Rules, 1972, a Govt. servant can be permitted to encash earned leave upto 10 days at the time of availing LTC. Hence, Government servants may encash earned leave either at the time of availing LTC himself or when his family avails it provided other conditions are satisfied.

Sd/-
(S.G. Muichancianey.)
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India

DOPT I.D. No. 14028/2/2013-Estt(L) dated 25th February, 2013
 

Source: CGDA
[http://cgda.nic.in/audit/enclLTC080413.pdf]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

List of Survey of India Guest House

List of Forms - Prescribed under Receipt & Payment Rules

MACP on Hierarchy: Supreme Court dismissed the Govt. petitions against HC Decision